Tags
AI Slop, blogging, culture, fake video, insanitybytes22, life, lying eyes, opinion, politics
We have arrived, the time is now to accept the fact that we have the ability to create not only fake images but fake video, too, and to do so in a way that makes it completely indistinguishable from reality. Long gone are the days of noticing someone has six fingers and their head is on backwards.
My social media feeds are plumb full of people who have been snookered and are now reposting completely made up video clips as if they were the God’s honest truth. The problem is, they are fake. They were made on a computer. They aren’t real. No such thing ever happened. They are like a cartoon, except with really sharp and exceptional graphics that appear real.
Also long gone, our ability to trust the media. They too keep falling victim to AI slop.
Some people are generating these things like a joke or as a meme. Some are creating them as a social commentary, kind of a fictional statement piece. Still others are creating them for more nefarious reasons, slander or to make someone look bad, or in order to generate an emotional response, to outrage people for a desired purpose, for manipulation. Businesses are doing it for advertising purposes, as are political movements. And most likely, unsavory characters have gotten in on the game, too.
The other day there was some fake video from an alleged 2026 protest and when I tried to use AI to fact check it, they got it wrong too. It actually took a bit of work to chase down the origins of this video clip, but in the end I was right. Even AI sometimes has trouble spotting fake video.
Nobody will listen to me of course and when you try to gently mention that something isn’t real it tends to really make people mad….at you. I become the one who is clearly just trying to suppress, repress, or oppress certain views and keep the public from seeing them. My motivations are called into question long before any video ever gets guestioned. People like to believe their own lying eyes, especially if it validates any preconceived notions they have emotionally invested themselves in.
Ha! Since it’s a bit foolish to subject myself to heaps of abuse just trying to enlighten each and every person who doesn’t seem to realize their favorite dancing squirrel video was artificially generated, this post is going to be my general, all purpose warning. One and done! We can all laugh at dancing squirrels, but I’ve also seen numerous altered, fake clips from Minnesota used for the purpose of amping protesters up and causing outrage.
It’s kind of interesting, my entire life I have hated cameras and refused to trust anything I’ve seen on video or in photos. I’ve had a heck of a time emotionally dealing with stupid security cameras and cell phones when they started to become the norm. These days everyone just wants to video every dumb interaction. I honestly have no idea where these feelings of mine came from, but it’s part of the reason why I am so skeptical about video, cameras, and photographs. I do not believe my lying eyes, not ever.
Sometimes there’s a generation gap going on here, too. Many people just a few years older than me perceive the news as some kind of trusted authority. That stands in such stark contrast to my own mindset, sometimes I have to try not to laugh. You see a similar division on the internet, video is perceived as evidence, proof, and it never really occurs to people that it can easily be faked these days.
Anyway, don’t let people yank your chain. Try not to get pulled in emotionally. I’m not even very good at it and yet even I can put together some pretty convincing fake video evidence showing whatever I want it too. Famous people are especially vulnerable on account of the fact that so many of their pictures and video are available online which makes it really easy to copy.
When I first started posting, one of the things I did was to fact check the chain emails that people would pass on to me. I would just investigate them and then reject them as a matter of fact. No. That is not true.
Most of these chain emails came from guys who were well educated and intelligent. They just got confused by three details. It did not occur to them that someone would lie. They expected the person who passed them the email to verify it, and the content of the email sound like the truth, that is, it fulfilled their expectations.
Anyway, my guess is that for the time being we will be able to use software to examine these AI fakes and find patterns in the pictures that reveal fakery. The problem will be that without software and the expertise required to use it properly, it will be difficult to detect the fakery. So, ironically, in an age when we have separated into opposing camps, we may become more dependent upon human witnesses. That will be particularly hard upon those people who believe we each have our own truth. What will they believe? Who? Why? How?
Even that soul who is determined to believe what they wish to believe must deal with their own guilt. When we lie to our self, we cannot entirely hide the lie. We can bury our guilt, but the stink of it is always there.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Tom, interesting point about how we may ironically, become more dependent on human witness. LOL, human witness of course, is often really fickle, but not to be completely dismissed!
I often say truth is not a thing or a set of facts, Truth is actually a person, the personhood of Jesus Christ. He says, “I am the way and the truth and the life.” I’ve always been fascinated by how Jesus asks the disciples, “who do you say I am” and the way Pontius Pilate says, “what is truth?”
To some extent we have a whole lot of power over how we proceed to go forth and create our own truths. Ha! And in case I ever doubted that fact, welcome to the internet in 2026. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
My sister earned her degree in photograph and taught me that photos do lie, all the time, from the moment the photo is taken. Everyone talked about the wonder of Ansel Adams photos; my sister showed me how he manipulated his work. Just this morning, KLOVE radio personalities were complaining about the recent fake info about TobyMax, including a video of him on The View, that never happened. You are not alone. Keep fighting the good fight.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks! Yes, I saw the recent AI slop about TobyMac. That’s exactly the kind of thing I was thinking of.
Somebody smart once told me that photos and video are flat and two dimensional, but in the real world we are in motion and everything is constantly changing, light, shadow, focus, so a flat picture is not a true representation of what’s going on. You can really see this truth revealed in modern selfies. Big difference between getting caught with your mouth open and one eye closed versus a carefully posed photo of us staring off into the distance and looking 20 pounds lighter.
LikeLiked by 3 people
🙂 My sister says that the moment you frame a photo you’ve stamp your opinion on it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been playing with AI for a little while. Just using photos and animating them. I took one photo without makeup and I nearly scared myself to death when I saw the result. It’s all well and good when we look better than real but when reality hits home it’s time to quit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those of us that bother to check seldom check anything that fits with our own bias. We check the stuff that doesn’t agree with the way we think. This whole thing is about critical thinking and developing a personal filter. The funny thing there is that every single person following this blog, as an example, will laud their personal ability to critical think through everything. When in fact.. we are all different in how we decide to define and then apply a critical think process. Some of us can do it… some of us can’t or chose not to. Most of it we simply don’t have the time in our varied lives to spend time researching every damn thing flying in front of our eyes. There are those of us who actually try to insulate ourselves from media or TV altogether for fear of having to make choices. Being cynic of everything is a way of compensating from having to apply critical thinking effort as a filter.
But because we simply can’t do this filtering all the time we allow ourselves to find sources we might give a nod to regarding factual reporting. Here again… facts can be universally accurate but the interpretation of those facts can be contextual.. and matters of opinion. Most in this blog will assign the media in general as some sort of corrupt social villains, politically aligned one way or the other to lie for their owner/employers and make us believe things we don’t want to believe. Yet for the time being I have absolutely no time to challenge the authenticity of imagery for fear that it may sway me into some dastardly position. I will tend to rely on legacy media as a source filter (“We are unable at the moment -in the process of verifying- to verify authenticity of what you are seeing.”). When they release it I will likely accept it. That’s a far cry from interpreting it to form my opinion. If they violate that trust then I take that into consideration. But to presume news being reported is all corrupt… is being just plain lazy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The funny thing there is that every single person following this blog, as an example, will laud their personal ability to critical think through everything.”
The funny thing is that your own bias leads you to stereotype, “every single person on this blog” when in fact, you’ve probably interacted with a total of about five of us.
“Yet for the time being I have absolutely no time to challenge the authenticity of imagery…”
Yes. That’s kind of why I wrote this post. I’ve noticed that many people seem completely disinterested in questioning the validity of images and video.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s not about who or how many I’ve interacted with.. it’s completely about human nature.
LikeLike
It seems like you have decided to stereotype thousands of subscribers to this blog based on nothing but your own preconceived biases. You can’t possibly know what you claim to know on account of the fact that you don’t know them all or even the majority.
In addition, this particular post also refutes your idea that, “every single person following this blog… will laud their personal ability to critical think through everything.”
I happen to be saying that no, no we cannot. Due to advances in technology, we no longer have the ability to critically think our way through video and photographs and determine if they are real or not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We can’t possibly know if a video is fake or not unless we have some ability to verify it, and indeed we do not have the tech or the knowledge to descern that. So.. what’s left? Well, believe in what you are seeing and make your interpretation… or… find a source we might trust to make such attempts… or… ignore it completely and move on…. or… take it under advisement by reserving judgement, and qualifying such doubt if used to make a point. I am saying since we can’t take for granted the truth of imagery there are work arounds that will require some extra considerations… yet because we are human not everyone will exercise those options.
LikeLike
yeah, that’s why I was thinking.
lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: To be does not equal not to be. In fact there the same thing. – Public Unity Party of America -The Children's Party
Pingback: Making a newer self in the moon light of life. – Public Unity Party of America -The Children's Party