There’s a catch phrase out and who does not love culture, politics,and words? “Alternative facts,” is the new phrase, as in you are not entitled to your alternative facts.
Au contraire, I am totally entitled to my alternative facts. In a world full of endless narratives, moral relativism, and subjective truth, you do not suddenly get to claim possession of “the facts.”
It’s a bit amusing, I have long been a champion of alternative facts, so when this little phrase suddenly popped up on the news and in the culture, I was quite delighted. It warmed the cockles of my cold little heart.
I know, I know hearts don’t really have cockles, but like I said, I am fully entitled to my alternative facts.
Ever since I’ve been on the internet the bane of my existence, indeed, the very blight on my potato, has been this pedantic assault of the linear thinkers. It is not personal, it is just that I am not a linear thinker at all, so if I say “the sky is blue” and someone comes along to declare that untrue, because science clearly states it isn’t the sky that is blue at all, I tend to get annoyed.
Or I would get annoyed if I hadn’t long since lost my capacity to do much more than groan and roll my eyes.
I don’t really want to debate the color of the sky. Or the fact that my life is not literally a potato with some blight on it. Or the fact that I have totally exaggerated the “bane of my existence” and engaged in a bit of hyperbole. I get that, I know what I’m doing, I’m relatively familiar with my own writing style. I am attempting to communicate here, not writing a legal brief. Or a peer-reviewed science paper. Or working for the mainstream media, although I must say if you want to really see alternative facts and subjective truth in action, they’re your best source……
I read Orwell’s 1984, more than once, and he says, “Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”
Yes exactly. Like the idea that we can create hyperbolic narratives about nazis that don’t even apply, while declaring truth to be totally subjective, all while whining about other people’s alternative facts. Doublethink, like insisting on complete and total tolerance of all differences… while declaring your right to enforce mandatory compliance to one set of beliefs?
It’s a bit comical, if I were facing Dragnet, Detective Joe Friday, “Just the facts ma’am,” I would just stare at him in complete confusion. Which facts? From what perspective? Which voice am I observing this situation with? How are my words going to be used? Which aspect of this tale is going to be most useful to you? Do you want me to empathize with the bad guy or speak from the perspective of a witness?
All in good fun here, but I would just sit down and cry, that’s what I would do. Joe Friday has just made my brain hurt. I have no idea what he’s asking for.
I admit, I confess, I have never been a big stickler for precise facts, but that is only possible because I am firmly rooted in the Truth. Truth always trumps the silliness of “facts.”
It depends on who is stating the facts as to wether alternative (true) facts are warranted. Good post!
LikeLiked by 2 people
My only criticism of Mr Spicer is that the sole possessors of the “alternative facts” are his critics.
LikeLiked by 1 person
… of which YOU have now suggested are one… Crazy, but I just watched a ‘live-broadcast’, heard verbatim a speech, and less than a minute after, a newscaster reporting on the speech, MISQUOTED the speaker! At the conclusion of the broadcast, the MISQUOTE was repeated in the concluding remarks!
LikeLiked by 2 people
😳
LikeLike
The Corporate Media reports ‘facts’; they just leave out all of the relevant details Like they recently said that Obama’s Legacy was ‘scandal-free’ without mentioning that it was because they never bothered reporting any scandals.
LikeLiked by 6 people
His legacy left us with a fake birth certificate.
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/nation-and-world/arizona-s-sheriff-joe-arpaio-closes-investigation-obama-birth-certificate
I know someone who’s looked at the documentary evidence as well and concludes Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation results are correct.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Truly a great post. You’ve nailed post-truth and alternative facts to the wall. Love it. I couldn’t help but think, And the Bible isn’t a legal brief or a peer-reviewed (since God doesn’t exactly have a peer to begin with) science paper either.
HA! One of the best lines: “Or working for the mainstream media, although I must say if you want to really see alternative facts and subjective truth in action, they’re your best source……”
Becky
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ha! A peer reviewed bible, I like that! Very funny. Where in the world are we going to find a peer to review it? 🙂
LikeLiked by 4 people
Just the Truth, M’am. Just the Truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂 Yep
LikeLike
This post made me lough out loud, thank you! Very well done.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Glass Planet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Playful and yet profound–great post! J.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Or working for the mainstream media, although I must say if you want to really see alternative facts and subjective truth in action, they’re your best source……”
In other words, Orwellian “Newsspeak”…”designed to diminish the range of thought.” 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
It took me years, but I finally realized the mass media is not worth much.
The mass media does two things.
1. They provide an audience for advertisers.
2. They provide devious people a vehicle for shaping public opinion.
Most of the corporate news media exists to shape public opinion. It allows big corporate executives an easy way to protect their political interests from devious politicians and to reward favored politicians. Of course, lots of people are onto this. Thus, when the news media decided that the Donald was the story and covered him enough to make him the Republican nominee, the voters angrily responded. We could stop the news media’s hanky-panky, but we did shove it down their throat. Thus, the one they thought the easiest of the Republican candidates to beat is now the president.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post on what is one of the most important issues in world poltics today. It has been many years since I last read an Orwell but the appearance of terms like post-truth, alternative facts and fake news prompted me to review the 1984 film adaptation. It holds up remarkably well for a 33 year old film. You are welcome to visit and see how the film stacks up in todays cinematic terms.
LikeLiked by 1 person