The usual suspects have spent the past week quite enamored with the idea of sex robots, and blogged about it most favorably. Tomassi has written about the “Planned Obsolescence” of women. What can I say, it’s a Brave New World and Stepford Wives R Us.
It’s somewhat amusing that none of these intellectual powerhouses have considered the fact that sex robots, rather than replacing women, could actually serve to replace men. Pride has a way of rendering one unable to see the forest for all the trees. Or perhaps they view their sex robots as some kind of consolation prize for the way men have been slowly written out of the biological equation, as we rapidly work to replace men and marriage with the protection and provision of the State.
I have a rather dark and cynical take on all this, almost bittersweet in its painful awareness of the truth. I don’t fear the obsolescence of women, obsolescence has been our state of being since the dawn of time. Girls are born into the world struggling for relevance, a world dominated by men. Heck, girls are born into the world struggling just to survive. Some of us don’t even make it to being born, sex selection tends to heavily favor males.
Tomassi says, “Women tend to conflate their personal, intrinsic value with their sexual market value.” Women do no such thing, men do that to us, men, and women who are the keepers of culture, those mothers who enforce female genital mutilation and Chinese foot binding, practices all through history designed to increase the sexual market value of girls.
Ask those 8 yr old girls turning tricks for American tourists in Thailand about their intrinsic worth and value as women. Ask a rape victim. Ask a child sexual abuse survivor about her intrinsic worth and value in the world of men. Ask all those club girls and dancers, prostitutes and trafficked kids. Heck, watch a catty young girl try to disqualify and discredit another woman. 99% of the time it’s going to involve demeaning her sexual worth and value.
The average age a girl learns what her intrinsic worth and value really is? 12 yrs old. By the time she is 12 yrs old she will have already learned every derogatory term designed to sexually shame women and remind us where our worth and value truly lies. She doesn’t need all those shaming words however, a few years of TV advertising has already taught her that women are nothing more than sexual commodities designed to sell products.
Miley Cyrus didn’t ride a wrecking ball and dance half-naked with teddy bears because people value her for her musical ability. In fact, a woman who can find popularity within the culture based on her musical abilities rather than her willingness to parade across the stage half-naked, is a rare woman indeed.
Obsolescence “is the state of being which occurs when an object, service, or practice is no longer wanted even though it may still be in good working order.”
Girls are born into the world struggling for relevance, fighting obsolescence, using every skill we have to avoid being perceived as nothing more than an object, a service, a practice, a commodity. Why is it so critical that we seek the favor of men, attempt to convince them we are full human beings, rather than flat two-dimensional sex objects? Because an object can be perceived as having no human worth and value, just a bit of collateral damage one needn’t feel any moral compunction about using and simply throwing away. Or leaving somewhere in a shallow grave….
Where do women learn what their personal, intrinsic value is really all about? From men! Women conflate nothing, women learn to perceive ourselves the way others have perceived us. Symbiosis. Karma, perfect justice. Who teaches us to perceive men as the enemy and to avail ourselves of whatever weapons we can use to defend ourselves?
Not all men are like this however, there are many fathers, husbands, brothers, who perceive girls and women as actual human beings, half the human race having intrinsic worth and value that goes way beyond our sexuality. I am blessed to have been surrounded by these kinds of men for so long, that I’ve nearly forgotten that the other kind even exists.
Orcs, I call them orcs. I do not fear the takeover of the sex robots, I embrace it. Any man like Dalrock who attempts to debate the moral hazards of exploiting a sex robot, a moral conundrum he has never even bothered to ask when it comes to an actual living, breathing, feeling woman, simply does not belong in the world of human relationships.
To achieve obsolescence in the eyes of such men would be a blessing for women and girls indeed. Bring on the robots.
See, there's this thing called biology... 
Great, as usual, IB.
Bitter, sweet, gritty, rapier-sharp, and at the same time gentle and loving.
There are lots and lots of reasons why you’re one of the best bloggers in the world, and this post is one of them. If someone doesn’t love women and men by reading what you write, then he hasn’t been paying attention.
Best,
— x
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. Your kind words and nuggets of wisdom are always much appreciated. 😉
LikeLike
Hmmm. you are on a roll tonight IB. I won’t say you’re wrong – but as you mentioned, there are many good men out there who don’t see women as objects.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hear, hear! I have to say I’m surrounded by the good type of man you speak about; but sadly, if you look closely, even my daughters get this derogatory attitude (subconsciously), not from the brother, father, and grandfather who treat them very respectfully but from the women… grannies, aunties… “Have you gained weight? You have to diet or else nobody will want you…” Excuse me?? What else is fat-bashing (or should I just call it “figure-bashing”, because what classifies as “fat” even boggles the mind, today) than bringing a girl’s self-image down to the “lowest common denominator”? And it parades as “I’m just worried about you”, as though one needs to worry about a healthy 18-year-old who carries 5 to 10 kg of non-pathogenic “padding” because she is under exam stress? Diabetes? you’ve got to be kidding – none of us ever got diabetes, alright, one of the old men did at age 80+ due to overconsumption of alcohol, none of us rounded women ever did!
Thanks 🙂 Brilliant post, I agree, bring on those robots so that only the good guys remain who are actually interested in our daughters’ minds and personalities and want to be fully worthy equal partners, not “bosses”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually went and read his post… all I can say is, what drivel. Couldn’t finish reading to the end. It’s okay – don’t tangle with the “manosphere” and the “Red Pill” movement. Just ignore them. They will die out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do have to wonder how Mrs. Tomassi and Churchian Gamehens feel about being replaced by machinery.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Relieved? Grateful? Blessed?
LikeLike
My bet is all three.
LikeLike
I’m surprised that no one has seen the obvious problem with female androids: computer software can be weaponized. Imagine in the Gamecock Utopia, where women are obsolete and somebody decides to play ‘Westworld’ on them. Or, imagine the potential for mind control—subliminal messages timed with male orgasm, for example.
Another problem is going to be societal. Feminism has tried to eliminate masculinity—has that improved women? Without the complimentary opposite gender, society goes into androgyny and sterility.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ha! Oh dear, weaponized robots, I never thought of that. Not long ago somebody hacked some computerized public toilets, which was somewhat amusing and mischievous. Westworld, indeed. If it happens, let’s hope it’s a comedy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha—yes, and in light of the Ashley Madison scandal, imagine sexbot memory banks getting hacked and downloaded!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not surprisingly, Dalrock has also chimed in, shaking his head in disgust that women’s insistence on emotional bonding during sex has led to this situation, and opining: “Sexbots in this context be yet another distraction tempting young men to coast instead of working diligently in anticipation of their future wives tiring of having sex with other men.”
Aja, what a moron. What man in his right mind ever does that? I suppose, if one believes with Tomassi that “80% of men are Betas” who don’t understand the secret revelations given to the Gamer Cult, it might sound somewhat logical.
LikeLike
<i"…yet another distraction tempting young men to coast instead of working diligently in anticipation of their future wives tiring of having sex with other men.”
Crude or not, this is a bitter truth. Our culture has (and the church has turned a blind eye) to young women pursuing all their ambitions and fulfilling their lusts- sexual or otherwise- throughout their early to mid 20’s only to wax eloquent about how many wonderful, accomplished, attractive women there are approaching 30 who are unable to find a husband. And basically it really does boil down to the way Dalrock expressed it: Young men are expected to marry women who have finally tired of having sex with other men and want to find a nice guy to settle down with. That’s the dominant narrative. Or at least it was from the late 80’s until about the 10 years ago.
Now, for the most part, I think this is an obsolete frame to argue from. Young women of any substance at all are not dating much, marrying quite early when/if the chance presents itself, and are living a much more chaste life (regardless of religious leanings) than you may realize. I have three early 20’s virgin daughters and their friends are either marrying, spending their Friday and Saturday nights alone, or here since we’re the only people they know who actually cook food. But they ain’t on the cock carousel.
So it’s not as cut and dry as it seems from either side.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The problem with Dalrock’s argument is that he’s accepting that as normative female and encouraging men to behave as it though it were normative. The correct response is teach men to be proactive—ignore women who do these things and reward ones like the young women you described by pursuing them instead.
LikeLike
Well if your standard for virtuous woman hood is virginity before marriage (and that IS the Biblical standard) then in effect it really is normative. Let’s not kid ourselves.
The young women I am speaking of (including my daughters) are for the most parts modest, nondescript, and attractive in ways that don’t trip sexual meters.No, not ugly or fat at all. But they don’t appear to think in terms of “how can I get men to notice me?”
It’s something I have to really get my own girls to do: girl it up a bit, LOL. Especially since they say they want marriage and right now rather than later.
The elephant in the room is that the girls in the 3″ inch inseam shorts are everywhere, getting noticed and the girls in the 6 1/2″ Bermuda shorts and no cleavage or makeup aren’t really invisible. They just want attention from the wrong men. *wink wink*
LikeLiked by 3 people
Bravo! When it comes to defending women’s dignity, you are worth ten times a couple of battalions of stupid academic feminists.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you for your kind words, much appreciated.
LikeLike
Very well written. Preach on sister.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good post, IB.
I don’t, however, understand the whole brouhaha over sexbots. They have been available for a long while now, and nothing should stop the Irrational Male and his crew from availing themselves in their, um, glory. The sooner, the better, IMHO.
Here is one look at them and the men who love them (idealistically, of course ;)* ):
*Kidding aside, the “love,” as it were, for a sexbot is a great example of the kind of “idealistic love” that Tomassi & Co. blather about when they crow that men love idealistically (while women opportunistically). It is a narcissistic infatuation with a static, unchangeable object of sexual wish fulfillment by men who are incapable of forming mutually satisfying and loving relationships with real women.
Tomassi & Co.’s problem with women is that they do not conform to that particular image (of a static object of wish fulfillment), what with having thoughts, feelings, and desires of their own. Some of them even act on those, dreadful as it sounds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oof. I thought the link would be just text. In any case, this very interesting documentary is NSFW. But well worth watching.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Considering too that the Gamecocks all determine their status as ‘manly alpha leaders’ by sexual conquest and reproduction, wouldn’t getting a sexbot obviate the need to learn Game or be an Alpha? LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the video, Mildly. It puts a whole new spin on the idea of men loving ideally, while women love opportunistically.
This kind of idealism seems to involve an inanimate object.
I do not by the way subscribe to the “men as idealists, women as opportunists” theory, but I can certainly see how one’s idealism could descend into a need for total control of the fantasy, especially if you were a narcissist that needed to control the illusion being reflected back to you, control your very identity.
Uhg, thanks, now I shall have nightmares 😉
LikeLike
Good questions, Eric.
I suspect that once these pesky and uncooperative carbon-based vagina-havers are eliminated, the man with the most glamorous / most expensive / most advanced* bots will be the most manly alpha leader of them all. The existence of powersexuals like red pillocks would remain unaffected by this development, and may even be enhanced, because their interest in women is purely as sex objects with an added function of status boosters. It is much easier to meet both objectives with eternally young and compliant HB10 bots than human women.
Eliminating the need for “game” should be a relief to these fellas, as “game” is something that they grudgingly force on themselves and each other in a belief that, like magic, it will turn them to princes from the frogs that they are. Because the Feminine Imperative (lol), and not because they are emotionally stunted and incapable of forming and maintaining healthy relationships with women.
*Fembots with sammich-making and kidbot-incubating / rearing capabilities.
LikeLike
IB, red pill is a distillation of male narcissism; and that self-serving, emotionally blind, and withdrawn from reality belief that “men love idealistically and women opportunistically” is just another expression of it. As is the rest of their hooey “philosophy” — or “praxeology,” as some of them bristle in their outraged, but unconvincing and unnecessary denials.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re probably right. The Manly Alpha Leaders will have the custom-made jobs; while the Blue-Pill Beta Chumps get the standard model at Wal-Mart or a used one with obsolete technology at Goodwill.
LikeLike
“…or a used one with obsolete technology at Goodwill.”
Now wait a minute Eric, let’s not underestimate the power of a good nerd and what he can do with some obsolete equipment from Goodwill. 😉
LikeLike
Robin Williams once had a comedy riff that went on about how the only way to deal with testosterone is for men to be able to detach their genitals and roll them around behind them on little wheels until a woman needed it. Sounds as though some want to reverse the situation: detach the rest of the self (heart, mind, etc.) and make their penis the center of their lives. For such, I like that line by the judge in Blazing Saddles: “Bailiff, whack his pee-pee!”
LikeLiked by 2 people
OK. I don’t know what to say. I mean, should I herald the “rapture” or the “rupture” or what?
Both IB and Dalrock liked this comment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! Yes, we both liked your comment but for entirely different reasons, I suspect. I liked it because you have good taste in comedy. Robin Williams, Mel Brooks, Gene Wilder, perfect.
I’d tell you why Dalrock liked it but truly, ignorance is bliss.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bliss for him. He hasn’t roiled my waters at all, and I think that he probably knows that it’s not worth trying. He’s a flea on the beast that Mystery rides, trying to keep women from developing strengths that don’t rely upon sexual manipulation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Probably not so much rapture as selective attention and comprehension, Brian. I think Dalrock was so taken with your first sentence that he did not read the second (and third, lol) carefully enough.
But even if he did, he’d probably not recognize himself in your words. Red pillocks do exactly what you say they do: they see reality with their penises — or more accurately, with their testosterone-enslaved primitive brains, which tell them that sex, control, status, dominance / submission and other manipulation games are what rules the world — and proclaim it The Truth (TM).
Those heart and mind things are, in their worldview, inventions of the Feminine Imperative designed to enslave men and strip them of their “true” psychopathic nature (curiously, however, they don’t like to be called psychopaths, even though everything they believe and say betrays their psychopathic characters; somehow truth, when directed at them, hurts their feelings).
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is also my concern, but as my final comment to IB indicates, I think that there is a community of women that benefit by having at their disposal men with such large handles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Erm, Brian… the large handles are a euphemism, right?
Yes, no doubt there are women who collude with psychopathic men and benefit from that collusion. Some of them are psychopathic themselves and enjoy the sex / control / dominance-submission / power games; others, non-psychopathic themselves, believe, erroneously, that coupling their lives to psychopaths will be a ticket to life security and other perks. They are impressed with the psychopaths’ “decisiveness” and “strength” (= a lack of inhibitions and scruples), and their ability to get what they want in life, seeing it as a ticket to provision for themselves and their offspring, as well as status.
The joys of such an arrangement with psychopaths are very short-lived for non-psychopathic women, who learn soon enough (or not) that being seen and treated as an object in exchange for life security isn’t as rewarding as they believed it.
BTW, I left a bunch of comments on your blog. Hope you don’t mind (too much).
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ll admit that “large handles” does not reference ears, for example.
There’s an aspect of this that may or may not comport with your world-view, Mildly Concerned. The reason that she is called “Mystery” in the Book of Revelation is because women that operate in this fashion don’t declare themselves. In my experience, they operate through psychic channels and wavelengths that people focused on material existence tend to ignore. They operate in the background for exactly the reasons you describe, to operate openly would be painful to them. In fact, many of them discover their psychic strength through the survival of humiliation, fear and righteous anger.
So I don’t see them as “the enemy”, I see them as a necessary constituency for healing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, there’s a problem here however. Masculinity and femininity were never really designed to denote predators and prey, oppressors and victims. So in the blink of an eye all women who align themselves with men are perceived as being victims of psychopaths or reversed, feminine wiles have allegedly enslaved all the totally innocent men. I grow weary of these tropes because they are like being trapped in a hall of mirrors, each gender projecting itself and it’s flaws onto the other.
All in good fun here,but we really need to get a handle on things.
LikeLike
Hmm. I’m not resonating with this. There’s a political landscape, with communities that subscribe to various practices. While we all have to potential to be whole, not all of us are. Part of achieving wholeness is to recognize the injury (where it exists) and take action to heal it.
So I offer that my comments are specific, not general. I don’t think that Dalrock and his ilk understand the nature of their disease. It’s not a “trope”, it’s a diagnosis.
I do have my own struggle with Mystery, but the scope is not so narrow (it extends to the animal kingdom, for example). I am pleased to have strong and gracious feminine allies in that engagement.
To be blunt, IB, my perception is that the dialectic you have established with Dalrock and others leaves a lot of air to clear. Your sharing of your experience of life is exemplary and inspiring. My own vision of masculine/feminine integration (and the challenges it entails) is somewhat more abstract and universal, and can be found in Chapter 12 of Love Works, available for download from the link on my home page.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I don’t think that Dalrock and his ilk understand the nature of their disease. It’s not a “trope”, it’s a diagnosis”
Very interesting, Brian. You may well be right, because I often get impatient with those who cannot see the nature of their own selves and act to rectify it immediately. That’s a bit of joke, “heal thyself this instant!” is certainly something I have been known to demand 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I may have offered this here before: many people that seek to heal themselves need a template. This is one of the roles served by our religious avatars. Unfortunately, the stripping away of their sexuality makes them unappealing to many. The Catch-22 is in the old saying: “Do as I say, not as I do.” If the avatars expressed their humanity fully, others would say “well, I can do that, too!”, but do so in the manner of all human frailty, which is to indulge themselves with pleasure when there is work to be done.
We need examples of healthy relation, which is indeed what you offer here. But to reach the limits of our potential, some reticence may be required until the masculine and feminine poles have learned to express fully their separate potentials.
LikeLike
Edit (because of course):
“being seen and treated as an object in exchange for (what they thought would be, but it almost never really is) life security isn’t as rewarding as they believed it”
LikeLike
Brian, help me understand: what is this mysterious Mystery of which you speak? I’m guessing it is not the infamous PUA who’s adopted that bombastic nickname for himself.
It appears that you promote a more esoteric, as it were, view of reality. I would agree that from that perspective, things in our earthly, human realm may be just exactly as they should, in spite of their messiness. The psychopathic dealings and entanglements are thus part of a larger, unseen, but necessary whole — or a plan perhaps — the workings of which are beyond our immediate comprehension.
This should not stop us from pointing them out, would you agree? There are different ways to describe this proverbial elephant which every one of us is touching in the dark, and, put together, they will lead us to truth, if not exactly THE truth. We are an evolving species, and, in spite of developmental hiccups that include various manifestations of psychopathy and/or evil in our lives, the direction of that evolution appears to point toward love, to use a shortcut encompassing all the higher level human values.
With respect to “healing” psychopathy here, during our brief existence on this planet, I have a darker view. It is simply impossible. There are no cases of psychopaths who suddenly developed a conscience and changed their ways. In cases where such transformation appears to have happened, we usually find, through examining the person’s history, that a conscience was present there after all, but was deafened by traumas, defense mechanisms, and/or extremely unfavorable circumstances.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Complex comment, here, MC. Let me try this:
The Bible, as I interpret it, is the story of Humanity’s psychological evolution away from a primitive spirituality received from the animal kingdom to a spirituality of reason. In Revelation, the imagery of the final conflict has Christ confronted by two avatars of primitive spirituality: a beast with seven heads that represents masculine aggression, and a red beast with seven heads that represents feminine manipulation. As you and IB have pointed out, these two things tend to stimulate each other.
The rider of the red beast is a woman with the word “MYSTERY” on her forehead.
The etiology of psychopathy is complex, but at least some research therapists suggest that it is an arrested stage of development. I take my understanding from Cozolino’s “The Neuroscience of Human Relationships.” The plasticity of the brain offers some hope here. He documents casework with patients who recognize the dysfunctionality of their behavior patterns, and crafts strategies and mental training that seeks to develop the centers of moral reasoning in the order typically seen in children.
My sense is that the brain is an interface to our souls, rather than the actual seat of our reason. Working with that model, I have had some really surprising interactions with people that were considered by others to be hopelessly dangerous. However, I have no documentation of the outcomes.
LikeLike
IB:
I often get impatient with those who cannot see the nature of their own selves and act to rectify it immediately
Yes, humans are so frustrating that way. They don’t conform to our wishes, no matter how much we insist they should. It’s so annoying that it’s almost as though there was a lesson in it or something.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the Mystery explanation, Brian.
Yes, there is some very limited possibility of positive change in psychopaths who show signs of discomfort with themselves (extremely rare) or their life circumstances (less rare).
This is the crux of the problem: to desire change, we must experience lasting dissatisfaction with ourselves. Psychopaths don’t. They believe there is nothing wrong with them (e.g., red pillocks*); it is others (e.g., society, women) who are not only in the wrong, but are out to get them (paranoia is often associated with psychopathy). They cannot see that they are in error and experience the necessary dissatisfaction with themselves, because they do not possess the psychological organ which makes it possible: conscience.
In order to be dissatisfied with oneself, one must have a conscience which allows one to feel empathy for others, shame, and guilt. Without it, any life difficulties caused by one’s behavior (broken relationships, lost jobs, prison, etc.) will be seen as other people’s fault, and any discomfort with oneself, if at all experienced, will be shallow and fleeting at best.
Psychopaths are incapable of emotional development precisely because they lack conscience. This disability, or defect, renders them incapable of grasping higher values that make us human. Instead of values, they have goals; and those are primitive (sex, power, etc.) and invariably self-centered.
There are some behavioral interventions that have proven somewhat successful with incarcerated criminal psychopaths, but their effectiveness even in behavioral modification has not been widely confirmed; they do not translate into character transformation, but make the behavior of the psychopaths treated this way in prisons less violent and more agreeable as they learn how to earn rewards specified in those interventions (by being compliant and somewhat sociable, or just pretending so).
Tying it into your views somewhat, there must be reasons, including spiritual ones, why psychopathy has persisted in our species throughout generations; but speculating about those is a subject for another missive. Although I’m always up for idle (and not) speculations, I suspect our gracious hostess may not be pleased about taking over her blog in such unceremonious ways (too late?).
BTW, Cozolino’s work is very good, but even he cannot create something out of nothing. He’s admitted as much in that book when discussing Chuck.
*To be accurate, red pillocks flipped the script with regard to dissatisfaction with oneself: prior to inventing their red pill, many of them did experience some discomfort, as they should, that stemmed from being unable to fit in society, form healthy relationships, etc. But instead of taking a clue from that discomfort about the direction necessary for their emotional development, along with responsibility for it — which is what a emotionally healthy / normal person, one with a conscience, would do — they created an upside down ideology positing that their psychopathy is the right way, and the human values and ideals are in the wrong. Unable to grasp those values and ideals, they dismiss them as the Feminine Imperative, to better combine their moral blindness with their misogyny. As such, their beliefs solidify their dysfunction, instead of challenging it, which is not surprising if we remember that the lack of conscience makes any such challenges null.
Legitimizing individual psychopathy through ideological beliefs — red pill, in this case — and calling it the “revolutionary” truth is quite typical, actually, for psychopathic social movements. It is not new, but it is tragic all the same — particularly for those who are not fully psychopathic and are on the cusp, so to speak, between the egocentric primitivism of psychopathy and some glimmers of human values, but get caught in that comforting web of rationalizations and lies that push them toward full psychopathization, cheered on by bona fide psychopaths who front the movement.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, articulated, MC. But please, I can’t deny myself, and will continue to offering healing as best as I can to all that reach out for it. That does include, of course, working to suck energy out of psychic pustules such as you describe.
LikeLike
LOL! Suck away, Brian.
BTW, I wanted to ask you about this, from your earlier comment (if IB does not kick us out; otherwise maybe we’ll take it up on your blog):
We need examples of healthy relation, which is indeed what you offer here. But to reach the limits of our potential, some reticence may be required until the masculine and feminine poles have learned to express fully their separate potentials.
What do you mean in this last sentence?
LikeLike
well, in the society where men are always potrayed bad, treated unfairly by the system eventhough the men did nothing wrong, where women always take advantage of men’s life through corrupt institution called marriage. I will say that the author of the article and the men who support him are not wrong at all. I have no bad relationship toward women, I don’t hate women. But I will not fall to the idea of marrying any woman or having relationship. Marriage always benefits women, not men. When there is a problem in marriage, men are more likely to be blamed regardless what the men and women do and will lose everything when they don’t find any solution.
LikeLike
I had ever posted in this blog about my friends’ marriage (friends in plural). Before they got married, they were happy, full of joy and everything changed when they got married. One of my friend even told me that he really wish for her wife’s death and everything will go back to normal again if her wife is not around. I know not all women are like that, but when it comes to marriage, men have to face uncertainty and it’s like you tried to play Russian roulette. I have read this guy’s blog and I saw he doesn’t try to represent all men, but try to warn the men about the worst case in relationship because not all women are muse
LikeLike
reminds me of a Ghost In The Shell movie :3
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do not really have the doom and gloom feelings about sex robots or other things like that.
People are unique and if it works for a person and no one else is being harmed, then who am I to call foul?
Anyway, even with these views I still see women as individuals and of vast importance.
I don’t believe that all women in porn are liked what was discussed in the post. I know women who are very free in their sexuality, but who still hold their individuality sacred.
The world is not black and white. Neither are the sexuality of people.
Scott
LikeLiked by 1 person
Brava!
Seems to me, male or female wedded to a sexbot has no capacity for human intercourse of any sort; they are narcissistic users only. A hell in which to dwell …And as any hell, self-imposed and maintained, though one must recall that we don’t choose our DNA. A sad case from any angle.
Parenthetically, don’t we produce more boys because girls last longer?
I wonder when prisons will become mass sexbot consumers? And while awaiting that, imagine the comedic dialogue over the pros and cons of permitting it?
And how far will sexbot designers and marketers be permitted to go in providing the mre outr’ variations born in the human psyche? (Possibilities boggle … )
What a species we are!
LikeLike